![]() ![]() If you think the most important thing is whether a game 'looks good', then you must play some extremely shallow video games. Clearly you're just a super casual gamer, looking for things with pretty sparkly graphics and dogshit easy gameplay, otherwise you wouldn't go around saying that one of the most influential games of all times isn't worth playing. You're dumb if you think new games are the only good games. Yes, it should? Are you outright admitting that you're so dumb you don't even know what I'm saying when I say you're "objectively wrong"? What kind of retort is that? Yes, because being "objectively wrong" means anything to me ![]() If that means that you never play a good game in your life and stick to shitty games, then be my guest. Clearly you can't handle anything with any complexity, aka fun and interactivity. You're just making it more and more clear that you've never played System Shock, and you never will. You absolutely said people shouldn't play classic games, you said that the graphics and controls are shitty, and made a comparison saying people shouldn't watch Citizen Kane. Just because you're too simple to figure out the controls, doesn't make it a bad game. So? It's still an amazing and revolutionary game. While with System Shock Uno you have to put time into it with shit controls and graphics. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |